Q 3/28 #TIDALWAVE + #NXIVM Sex-Slaver Arrested, CF/Br_nfman Ties
Q informed us today that within 30 days, the WH will be deep state free and secure. Meanwhile, sex-slaver, Keith Raniere was arrested in Mexico by the FBI on Monday for multiple accounts of sex-trafficking. Raniere’s organization, NXIVM, is funded largely by Sara and Clare Bronfman, the heirs to the Seagram’s fortune. Also, Q tells us the #TIDALWAVE is coming…
3/29 #NXIVM Deep State Sex Slavery Rabbithole, Part II Q: #BOTTOMSUP
As Q said on 3/27, The NXIVM scandal is another sex-slavery operation in the deep state web of mind control, human trafficking and bribery of powerful players. Part III to follow tomorrow!
#QWHO? NXIVM Part III: Bronfm_ns, Libya, MB, Sex Trafficking, #TRUTH
3/30 With Easter weekend upon us, we see Q and NXIVM called into question. As Truthers, we have to dig into the information and look at the people who populate our political (disease-infested) body.
On Thursday the Holy See stated that a reported interview between Pope Francis and an Italian journalist, which claims the Pope denied the existence of hell, should not be considered an accurate depiction of Francis’ words, but the author’s own “reconstruction.”
A recent meeting between Pope Francis and Italian journalist Eugenio Scalfari, 93, was a “private meeting for the occasion of Easter, however without giving him any interview,” the March 29 communique stated.
“What is reported by the author in today’s article is the result of his reconstruction, in which the literal words pronounced by the Pope are not quoted. No quotation of the aforementioned article must therefore be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father.”
Scalfari, a self-proclaimed atheist, is the founder and former editor of Italian leftist newspaper La Repubblica. In an article published on the site March 29, Scalfari claims that Pope Francis told him, “hell doesn’t exist, the disappearance of the souls of sinners exists.”
Scalfari’s fifth meeting with Pope Francis, it is not the first time he has misrepresented the Pope’s words following a private audience.
In November 2013, following intense controversy over quotes the journalist had attributed to Francis, Scalfari admitted that at least some of the words he had published a month prior “were not shared by the Pope himself.”
In a meeting with the journalists of the Foreign Press Association of Rome in 2013, Scalfari maintained that all his interviews have been conducted without a recording device, nor taking notes while the person is speaking.
“I try to understand the person I am interviewing, and after that I write his answers with my own words,” Scalfari explained. He conceded that it is therefore possible that “some of the Pope’s words I reported, were not shared by Pope Francis.”
Scalfari also falsely reported that Pope Francis had made comments denying the existence of hell in 2015.
Vatican spokespersons have dismissed the texts of Scalfari as unofficial. In 2014, Fr. Federico Lombardi, past papal spokesperson, told CNA that “if there are no words published by the Holy See press office and not officially confirmed, the writer takes full responsibility for what he has written.”
Pope Francis has previously spoken about the existence of hell in public speeches, including at a prayer vigil in March 2014.
There he gave an address in which he said that members of the mafia should change their lives, “while there is still time, so that you do not end up in hell. That is what awaits you if you continue on this path.”
The Vatican has denied that Pope Francis told a well-known Italian journalist that “there is no hell”.
The quote came in an article in Italy’s La Repubblica daily. But the Vatican said “no quotations” in the article “should be considered as a faithful transcription” of the Pope’s words.
However, Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the most senior Catholic in England and Wales, said “there’s nowhere in Catholic teaching that actually says any one person is in hell”.
He told the BBC that the Pope was apparently exploring “the imagery of hell – fire and brimstone and all of that”.
“That’s never been part of Catholic teaching, it’s been part of Catholic iconography, part of Christian iconography,” he said.
Hell is fundamental to Christian iconography, as in this 16th-Century engraving
According to Scalfari’s article on Thursday, he asked the Pope where “bad souls” go and where they are punished. The journalist is an avowed atheist.
“Souls are not punished,” the Pope was quoted as saying in the Repubblica piece. “Those who repent obtain God’s forgiveness and go among the ranks of those who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot be forgiven disappear. There is no hell – there is the disappearance of sinful souls.”
The Vatican said it had not been an interview, but a private meeting on the occasion of Easter, and Scalfari’s article “is the fruit of his reconstruction”.
Vatican City, Mar 29, 2018 / 08:21 am (CNA/EWTN News).- On Thursday the Holy See stated that a reported interview between Pope Francis and an Italian journalist, which claims the Pope denied the existence of hell, should not be considered an accurate depiction of Francis’ words, but the author’s own “reconstruction.”
A recent meeting between Pope Francis and Italian journalist Eugenio Scalfari, 93, was a “private meeting for the occasion of Easter, however without giving him any interview,” the March 29 communique stated.
“What is reported by the author in today’s article is the result of his reconstruction, in which the literal words pronounced by the Pope are not quoted. No quotation of the aforementioned article must therefore be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father.”
Scalfari, a self-proclaimed atheist, is the founder and former editor of Italian leftist newspaper La Repubblica. In an article published on the site March 29, Scalfari claims that Pope Francis told him, “hell doesn’t exist, the disappearance of the souls of sinners exists.”
Scalfari’s fifth meeting with Pope Francis, it is not the first time he has misrepresented the Pope’s words following a private audience.
In November 2013, following intense controversy over quotes the journalist had attributed to Francis, Scalfari admitted that at least some of the words he had published a month prior “were not shared by the Pope himself.”
In a meeting with the journalists of the Foreign Press Association of Rome in 2013, Scalfari maintained that all his interviews have been conducted without a recording device, nor taking notes while the person is speaking.
“I try to understand the person I am interviewing, and after that I write his answers with my own words,” Scalfari explained. He conceded that it is therefore possible that “some of the Pope’s words I reported, were not shared by Pope Francis.”
Scalfari also falsely reported that Pope Francis had made comments denying the existence of hell in 2015.
Vatican spokespersons have dismissed the texts of Scalfari as unofficial. In 2014, Fr. Federico Lombardi, past papal spokesperson, told CNA that “if there are no words published by the Holy See press office and not officially confirmed, the writer takes full responsibility for what he has written.”
Pope Francis has previously spoken about the existence of hell in public speeches, including at a prayer vigil in March 2014.
There he gave an address in which he said that members of the mafia should change their lives, “while there is still time, so that you do not end up in hell. That is what awaits you if you continue on this path.”
Citing Pope Paul VI, the Catechism of the Catholic Church says that Catholic teaching “affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, ‘eternal fire.’ The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.”
The Vatican has had to seal off part of St. Peter’s Basilica after chunks of plaster fell from the ceiling just hours after Pope Francis is alleged to have proclaimed that ‘Hell’ does not exist.
ALIEN WARNING 13th April 2018 Message Live on TV PLANET X NIBIRU will Destroy Everything On my channel you will find a lot of great news!
PRAYER TO WRITE MY NAME IN THE BOOK OF LIFE (TO BE SAVED)
Powerful Prayer to Write my name in The Book of Life to be saved. Father God, I am a sinner and I need to be saved from my sins. You said in Your Holy Word of Romans 10:9; that if we confess the Lord our God, and believe in our hearts that You Heavenly Father, raised out Jesus from the dead, we shall be saved. So I now confess Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. By faith I gratefully receive your gift of salvation. I am ready to trust you Jesus as my Lord, God and Savior. I here and now repent for my sins, and believe in my Lord Jesus Christ, who is the only begotten Son of God. I believe that Jesus died for me, as my substitute, and rose from the dead according to the Bible. Thank you Father God for sending Your Holy Son, paying my debt in full. My Lord, even though I was separated from You by my sins, You saw me helpless and fallen, and loved me enough to even die for me. I believe that you my Lord Jesus suffered the penalty of my sins, and paid the full price to clear my debt. Your Word declares that your Precious divine holy blood pays for all of my sins. Because You suffered my penalty, I am now free. No sin remains to condemn me. I’m no longer guilty before You. I believe the good news of the Cross, and Your promise of Acts 2:21 declaring that “Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Only you my Lord Jesus are able to save me from Hell, and give me Eternal Life. Heavenly Father, I believe Jesus is your Son, and that You Father God raised his mortal body from the dead. I do now with my heart, accept Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior, in Jesus name. Thank you my Lord Jesus for bearing my sins and giving me the gift of eternal life. I believe in You Jesus, and your holy word, come into me Lord Jesus, and be my Savior and God. My Lord Jesus please come into my heart, and change me from a sinner to a Child of God. Teach me your ways my Lord, Lead me to a good church and good bible believing friends that will help me, and encourage me in your holy Word. Please write my name in your book of Life, and never blot it out, but fill me with the Holy Spirit and seal my salvation for all Eternity, in the name of my Lord God Jesus Christ.
My Lord Jesus, today I accept Your gift of love, peace and eternal life. I declare by faith that Jesus now lives in me, as Galatians 4:6 states; “Because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son [Jesus] into our hearts, crying “Abba, Father.” So I am a new creation in Jesus Christ my Lord, born again of God with the life of Jesus in me. I declare the divine holy blood of my Lord Jesus blots out every sin from my life in Jesus name. My record is clean by your mercy. According to Your holy Word, I am now forgiven; I am now saved in my Lord Jesus Christ. Thank you my Lord Jesus for dying for me, and giving me eternal life. I pray all of these in the mighty name of my Lord God and Savior Jesus Christ, amen.
(The Book of Life contains the names of those who have been spiritually converted to Christ, and who have dedicated their lives to the service of God)
Write my name in the book of life prayer is another powerful prayer of EternalWorddotorg, make sure to subscribe for more here https://www.youtube.com/subscription_…
PRAYER TO SAVE MY SOUL AND MY LIFE (SALVATION PRAYER)
In a textbook example of denial and projection, Trump foes in and out of government wove a sinister yarn meant to take him down.
Barack Obama keeps a close watch on his emotions. “I loved Spock,” he wrote in February 2015 in a presidential statement eulogizing Leonard Nimoy. Growing up in Hawaii, the young man who would later be called “No-Drama Obama” felt a special affinity for the Vulcan first officer of the U.S.S. Enterprise. “Long before being nerdy was cool, there was Leonard Nimoy,” the eulogy continued. “Leonard was Spock. Cool, logical, big-eared and level-headed.”
It is the rare occasion when Obama lets his Spock mask slip. But November 2, 2016, was just such a moment. Six days before the presidential election, when addressing the Congressional Black Caucus, he stressed that the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, threatened hard-won achievements of blacks: tolerance, justice, good schools, ending mass incarceration — even democracy itself. “There is one candidate who will advance those things,” he said, his voice swelling with emotion. “And there’s another candidate whose defining principle, the central theme of his candidacy, is opposition to all that we’ve done.”
The open display of emotion was new, but the theme of safeguarding his legacy was not. Two months earlier, on July 5, in Charlotte, N.C., Obama delivered his first stump speech for Hillary Clinton. He described his presidency as a leg in a relay race. Hillary Clinton had tried hard to pass affordable health care during Bill Clinton’s administration, but she failed — and the relay baton fell to the ground. When Obama entered the White House, he picked it up. Now, his leg of the race was coming to an end. “I’m ready to pass the baton,” he said. “And I know that Hillary Clinton is going to take it.”
But he was less certain than he was letting on. Hillary Clinton was up in the polls, to be sure, but she was vulnerable. Three weeks earlier, on June 15, a cyberattacker fashioning himself as Guccifer 2.0 had published a cache of emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee (DNC). They proved, as supporters of Vermont senator Bernie Sanders had long alleged, that the DNC had conspired with the Clinton campaign to undermine their candidate. Sanders was still withholding his endorsement of Clinton for president, even though her nomination as the Democratic candidate was now a foregone conclusion. At the very moment when Clinton had expected the Democratic party to unite behind her, its deepest chasm seemed to be growing wider. In contrast to Clinton, Obama held some sway over the Sanders insurgents. He came to Charlotte to urge them to support Clinton against their shared enemy, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump.
The insurgency was not the only Clinton vulnerability on Obama’s mind. He had come to Charlotte, in addition, to deflect attention from the news conference that James Comey, the director of the FBI, had held that morning in Washington, D.C. The investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server was complete, Comey announced. The FBI would recommend no criminal charges — that was the honey. But Comey administered it with a dose of vinegar. He dwelled on Clinton’s mishandling of classified material in such detail that it sounded as if he was laying the foundation for an indictment. The decision not to charge Clinton, his statement signaled, was an exercise in prosecutorial restraint, not a true exoneration.
From the perspective of the voters, Clinton’s twin email travails — the hack of the DNC and the investigation into her server — were two faces of a single problem. Call it “Clinton, Inc.” Sanders and Trump were painting Clinton as Wall Street’s darling, the establishment candidate. She was the greatest defender and a prime beneficiary of a rigged political and financial system. Comey’s statement had played directly into the hands of the Sanders insurgents. It left the distinct impression that laws are for the little people; they simply don’t apply to Hillary Clinton, because, well, she’s Hillary Clinton.
Which points to Obama’s third and final job at Charlotte: humanizing the queen. “I saw how she treated everybody with respect, even the folks who aren’t, quote/unquote, ‘important,’” Obama testified. He enlarged Clinton’s humility before the crowd, because it was invisible to the naked eye. With his jacket and tie off, the cuffs of his sleeves turned, and a winning smile spread from ear to ear, Obama came to loan Hillary Clinton his common touch.
Passing the baton to her was a team effort, however. It demanded hard work from countless enablers. These included not just Democrats but also many Republicans, who shared the conviction that Trump represented an extraordinary threat to our democracy. Desperate times call for desperate measures. To block Trump, Clinton’s supporters bent rules and broke laws. They went to surprising lengths to strengthen her while framing him — both in the sense of depicting him in a particular light and of planting evidence against him. [btnsx id=”5955″]
* This story has been updated to include a statement from the Vatican (below).
Satan is real but hell might not be, according to the Pope. Photo credit: Getty/Newshub.
In another interview with his longtime atheist friend, Eugenio Scalfari, Pope Francis claims that Hell does not exist and that condemned souls just “disappear.” This is a denial of the 2,000-year-old teaching of the Catholic Church about the reality of Hell and the eternal existence of the soul.
The interview between Scalfari and the Pope was published March 28, 2018 in La Repubblica. The relevant section on Hell was translated by the highly respected web log, Rorate Caeli.
Scalfari says to the Pope, “Your Holiness, in our previous meeting you told me that our species will disappear in a certain moment and that God, still out of his creative force, will create new species. You have never spoken to me about the souls who died in sin and will go to hell to suffer it for eternity. You have however spoken to me of good souls, admitted to the contemplation of God. But what about bad souls? Where are they punished?”
Pope Francis says, “They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter the rank of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.”
Painting of Jesus rejecting the Devil’s
temptations in the desert.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: “The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, ‘eternal fire.’ The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.” (1035)
The Catechism further states, “The affirmations of Sacred Scripture and the teachings of the Church on the subject of hell are a call to the responsibility incumbent upon man to make use of his freedom in view of his eternal destiny. They are at the same time an urgent call to conversion: ‘Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life, and those who find it are few.’
“Since we know neither the day nor the hour, we should follow the advice of the Lord and watch constantly so that, when the single course of our earthly life is completed, we may merit to enter with him into the marriage feast and be numbered among the blessed, and not, like the wicked and slothful servants, be ordered to depart into the eternal fire, into the outer darkness where ‘men will weep and gnash their teeth.'”
Pope Benedict XVI said in a 2007 sermon, “Jesus came to tell us that he wants us all in Heaven and that Hell, of which so little is said in our time, exists and is eternal for those who close their hearts to his love.”
As for the human soul, the Catholic Church teaches that it is eternal, immortalin countless places throughout the Catechism. One instance, “Endowed with ‘a spiritual and immortal’ soul, the human person is ‘the only creature on earth that God has willed for its own sake.’ From his conception, he is destined for eternal beatitude.” (1703)
* In a statement released on Mar. 29, after Scalfari’s report garnered worldwide attention, the Vatican said:
“The Holy Father Francis recently received the founder of the newspaper La Repubblica in a private meeting on the occasion of Easter, without however giving him any interviews. What is reported by the author in today’s article [in La Repubblica] is the result of his reconstruction, in which the textual words pronounced by the Pope are not quoted. No quotation of the aforementioned article must therefore be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father.”
DOES HELL EXIST? POPE FRANCIS SAYS NO IN NEW INTERVIEW THAT COULD CHANGE CATHOLIC CHURCH FOREVER
Catholic Pope Francis made a startling revelation Thursday by stating that hell did not exist, in an interview with a leading liberal Italian newspaper.
In an article titled “It Is an Honor to Be Called a Revolutionary,” La Repubblicafounder Eugenio Scalfari acknowledged the pontiff’s previous remarks about how “good souls” who sought repentance from God would receive it and then asked, “What about the bad souls?” Seemingly going against centuries of core Christian belief, Pope Francis said the souls of sinners simply vanished after death and were not subject to an eternity of punishment.
“They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter the rank of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear,” Pope Francis said, as translated by Catholic blog Rorate Caeli.
“There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls,” he added.
Pope Francis leads the Chrism Mass on Holy Thursday, during which sacred oils are blessed at Saint Peter’s Basilica, at the Vatican, on March 29. That same day, Italian newspaper La Repubblica revealed that the pontiff believed that hell did not exist.
Shortly after the article was published, the Vatican issued a statement that claimed the article was “not a faithful transcript” and that the meeting between Pope Francis and Scalfari was a private meeting and not a formal interview.
“What is reported by the author in today’s article is the result of his reconstruction, in which the literal words pronounced by the Pope are not quoted. No quotation of the aforementioned article must therefore be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father,” the Vatican said in a statement translated by the Catholic News Agency.
The Catholic New Agency also pointed out that, after a controversial 2013 article, Scalfari admitted that some words attributed to the pontiff “were not shared by Pope Francis” himself.
Francis is the 266th Catholic pope and the first to be born outside of Europe. Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Buenos Aires to an Italian family that fled the fascist rule of Benito Mussolini, he entered the Society of Jesus, commonly known as the Jesuits, at the age of 21.
Since becoming pope following the resignation of his predecessor in 2013, Francis has been known a vocal supporter of reform for the Catholic Church and advocate for the poor. He has pushed for greater outreach to the young and other faiths as well as more liberal attitudes toward controversial topics such as contraception, evolution and homosexuality.
These ideals have often drawn the ire of the Catholic Church’s more conservative clergy, some of whom have pushed back against Pope Francis’s leadership.
Pope Francis has reportedly overturned millennia of Catholic teaching and said there is no hell for non-believers and sinners – only nothingness.
The comments, reported in Italian newspaper La Repubblica, were made to his long-time friend, atheist philosopher Eugenio Scalfari.
Mr Scalfari regularly meets with the Pope, but doesn’t record or transcribe their conversations.
“Hell does not exist – what exists is the disappearance of sinful souls,” the Pope said, according to Mr Scalfari.
“They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and go among the ranks of the souls who contemplate him. But those who do not repent, and therefore cannot be forgiven, disappear. There is no hell – there is the disappearance of sinful souls.”
After La Repubblica published Mr Scalfari’s claims, the Vatican issued a statement which didn’t deny the Pope’s alleged comments, but said they should not “be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father”.
The Catholic Church has long said hell is real. The Pope just last week warned members of the mafia they’d end up in hell if they didn’t give up their lives of crime.
Last year, the Pope said Satan was a real person, “not like mist”.
Mr Scalfari is the founder and former editor of La Repubblica, reportedly the Pope’s favourite newspaper. He says the Pope and he regularly chat, but like to meet in person for lengthy chats on religion and politics.
According to the Bible, those who sin and fail to accept Jesus Christ as their lord and saviour are “thrown into the lake of fire”.
Pope Francis ‘abolishes hell’, saying souls of unrepentant sinners will simply disappear
It is been accepted Christian doctrine since the founding of the church, but Pope Francis appears this morning to have abolished Hell.
In a move that will enrage conservative Catholics, the Pontiff told La Repubblicathat the souls of unrepentant sinners were not punished in the afterlife, but simply disappeared.
“Hell doesn’t exist, the disappearance of the souls of sinners exists,” he told Eugenio Scalfari, a 93-year-old atheist philosopher, during a conversation in the Vatican.
It was the fifth meeting between Pope Francis and Mr Scalfari, the founder of one of Italy’s leading newspapers. Mr Scalfari has retired as editor of the Rome daily, but continues as one of its leading writers.
The previous conversations between the two men have also caused controversy and prompted…
From Weather Internal. “A portrait of a spoiled child with adults using him for their own agenda and putting the spotlight over him. Evil in many ways. Opportunist.
“After heavy observation of this guy, reading his ridiculous tweets, hearing his dramatic Hitler-like speech, face emotions, and how when he’s cornered with a hint of truth he automatically brings in other people and says things like….
I’m so sorry to everyone that @IngrahamAngle has ever tried to hurt we are here for you and we love you
“This is a conundrum. You see, to the trained eye it goes like this; if you disagree or find Hogg’s statements appalling, you are seen as attacking a victim of a schooling shooting. I use victim very lightly as well. I explain why in a bit. Everything was fine up to this point. Why? Because dear David is taking the little bit of power he received from those with agendas and now is threatening Laura Ingraham with a boycott all because she, as a journalist and anchor, posted on how David was rejected by colleges. African Americans boycotted the bus services because of their racial seating arrangements on the bus, but dear David wants a boycott of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors because things got a little real for him. He is a manipulator, unfortunately.
“When I was his age, I was held up, face to face by four thugs, with four illegal guns, life flashing before my eyes and got out of it alive and grateful that the bullets didn’t hit me. Grateful! You see, I was a victim of gun violence; those kids who were shot or killed at David’s school or witnessed this were victims, NOT DAVID. The only thing he is a victim of are the adults using him like a puppet. I feel sorry for David. He has no idea … none. Now on to the articles.”
Laura Ingraham says Hogg whines over rejections by California colleges.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham’s put down of Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg as a whiny high school kid has prompted him to mount something more potent than a whine — a call for an ad boycott.
Hogg, 17, is one of a half-dozen students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in Parkland, Fla., who helped build a national movement for gun control following the killing of 17 people by a former student armed with an AR-15 style rifle on Valentine’s Day. Hogg was also a prominent speaker at a weekend march in Washington, D.C. calling for tightening gun laws.
Ingraham, who hosts a nightly show on Fox News, sought to cut him down with a tweet after he told TMZ that his bid to get into one of the four campuses of the University of California system was turned down, despite a 4.2 grade average and 1270 SAT score.
“It’s not been too great for me and some of the other members of the movement,” he said, blaming the “tsunami” of applications to college each year that makes it hard for an individual student to stand out.
Acknowledging that he was “absolutely disappointed,” Hogg noted that students like him are already changing the world. “If colleges want to support us in that, great, if they don’t it doesn’t matter, we’re still going to change the world,” he said.
David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA…totally predictable given acceptance rates.) https://t.co/wflA4hWHXY
in response, Ingraham thumped Hogg on Wednesday with a tweet: “David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it.”
Hogg, who has 595,000 Twitters followers, fired back Wednesday night with a cheeky question: “Soooo @ingrahamAngle, what are your biggest advertisers .. Asking for a friend.@BoycottingramAdverts.”
Pick a number 1-12 contact the company next to that #
Rep. Nydia Velazques, D-N.Y., also weighed in with her own tweet: “I have to ask — @IngrahamAngle — honestly, what kind of a mother bullies a HS student who survived a school shooting and a massacre? These kids know more about grace and class than you’ll ever understand.”
That was quickly followed by a list of 12 sponsors, ranging from Sleep Number to Wayfair with Arbys and Liberty Mutual in between, and a call for a boycott.
The bid was reminiscent of ad boycotts of other Fox news hosts, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly. After Hannity reported a conspiracy theory involving a slain staffer for the Democratic National Committee, he lost at least five advertisers, according to Fortune. At least 44 companies also pulled ads from O’Reilly’s show after allegations of sexual harassment. Fox eventually dropped the show entirely.
Hogg, an articulate, aspiring television journalist, spoke up early after the shooting, and had even taped real-time reactions from fellow students inside barricaded classrooms during the shooting. He quickly became a target of conservative pundits, who noted darkly that his father had been an FBI agent.
Other charges included false claims that he was part of a group of young actors who show up at the scene of shootings to go on camera, pretending to be a student. Some bloggers also questioned whether he was actually at the school at the time of the shooting, a claimed dismissed by Politifact.
As for his college options, Hogg said he was accepted at Florida Atlantic University, Cal Poly and Cal State San Marcos.
Meanwhile, Hogg and his fellow activists are trying to organize town hall meetings between young people and members of Congress in every congressional district to raise gun issues.
These Parkland activist kids may want to spend a little more time studying their history books and a little less time stumping for the Democrat party.
WHAT COULD GO WRONG? “David Hogg, one of the survivors of the Valentine’s Day Massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, has been a vocal proponent of gun control as a means of protecting school kids. Now, his sister, Lauren Hogg, is attempting to stir the national debate with her ‘armbands for change’ movement.”
Lauren Hogg later deleted her tweet and apologized after James Woods schooled her on history:
“You might have a little trouble getting Jewish Americans to embrace this look. Do you have some shiny jackboots and brown shirts to go with it? Guessing maybe you skipped history class while you were shilling for the @DNC.”
Except there’s just one problem with her “movement.” And actor James Woods wasted NO time pointing it out.
You might have a little trouble getting Jewish Americans to embrace this look. Do you have some shiny jackboots and brown shirts to go with it? Guessing maybe you skipped history class while you were shilling for the @DNC… pic.twitter.com/WfA4jL9y65
The same news media currently hyping claims that Donald Trump had a consensual affair with porn actress Stormy Daniels were largely uninterested in investigating the serious charges of sexual assault against President Bill Clinton, legendary comic Jackie Mason noted.
Trump has denied Daniels’ story, with White House Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shahon on Monday charging that “the only one who has been inconsistent is the one making the claims” – referring to Daniels.
Speaking during his regular segment on this reporter’s weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” Mason quipped:
Daniels entire story is consensual. There was no story of attacking her or abusing her. She wanted to have sex with him. Since when is that a crime? If you had to put everybody in jail because they had sex, the whole country would be in jail.
But the media ignored as Clinton was an out and out rapist. Remember Juanita Broaddrick? First he punches her and beats her up, and while she is bleeding he tells he to go put ice on it. More of the girls with Clinton ended up in hospitals than with sex. He wasn’t even interested in sex. He didn’t want to waste his time having sex. He punched them around. At least with Trump, every one of them can still see straight and they aren’t bleeding.
Broaddrick told NBC’s Dateline in 1999 that she resisted when Clinton suddenly kissed her in a hotel room in 1978, leading to the bloody lip:
Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip. … He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him “No,” that I didn’t want this to happen but he wouldn’t listen to me. … It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to “Please stop.” And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip. … When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says, “You better get some ice on that.” And he turned and went out the door.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, Broaddrick recounted during a Breitbart News video interview what she described as the life-changing experience of being raped by Clinton. Trembling, Broaddrick explained that she is still afraid of Clinton.
In a previous Breitbart News interview, Broaddrick said she was raped not once but twice by Clinton during the same infamous encounter in 1978.
Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones both accused Clinton of sexual assault, with Willey saying that she suffered acts of intimidation in what she has described as a campaign to silence her.
In 2016, Leslie Millwee, a former local television news reporter from Arkansas, told this reporter in an exclusive interview that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton on three separate occasions in 1980.
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.
Abraham Hicks: How easy it’s to get a lot of money, just apply the simple rule
Richard Lustig has been featured on many MAJOR news publications such as Good Morning America, the Rachael Ray Show, 20/20, Ripley’s Believe It Or Not..
Many of the links and stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material. Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’…you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. (17 US/Code 10)